Published works

Fire regimes vary widely across Australian ecosystems as a function of climate, fuel, terrain and ignition variations. Fundamentally such variation will not only shape the way that prescribed burning can reduce risk to human and environmental assets but also the scope for effective treatment. While many agencies are moving toward planning systems based on risk assessment, knowledge of the best way to use prescribed fire to reduce risk to key values is generally lacking. The BNHCRC Project, “From hectares to tailor-made solutions for prescribed burning”, combines simulation and empirical approaches to improve our understanding of how risk to any particular management value will respond to variations in the spatial location and rates of treatment. Here, we present the modelling framework and key results for two landscapes, Tasmania and the Australian Capital Territory. We run a large number of simulations using the PHOENIX RapidFire model, investigating the interaction between fuel treatment and location under various weather scenarios. Key outputs for risk assessment include area burnt, house loss, life loss, roads and powerlines damaged, environmental cost and economic cost. Across both case study landscapes, greater levels of prescribed burning tend to result in reduced wildfire impacts on all risks. However, there is considerable variation in the rate of reduction in risk, including the amount of treatment required to achieve key targets. Further, the particular combination of weather factors underpinning given fire weather conditions (e.g. temperature vs wind driven) can substantially impact the overall level of risk, as well as the response to prescribed burning.