End User representatives
Fuel reduction burning is often patchy as a result of fuel and climatic conditions and inherent landscape-related features such as topography and soil moisture, with a strong sampling design required to capture this variation. With bushfires becoming more intense the larger they become, affecting soils and vegetation more. It is unknown if the same situation arises with prescribed burning.
The relationships between burn size and soil, water, vegetation and fuel outcomes has yet to be quantified. The ability to predict the effects of prescribed burns of different size across landscapes is currently negligible.
To design an a priori sampling scheme of prescribed burns with appropriate statistical power, it is important to define what a ‘small’ fire is compared to a ‘big’ fire. Logically, larger fires will need to be sampled at a different scale and frequency than smaller fires.
To determine historical fire size, data relating to fire size, location and timing for the last 10 years will be used from New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Western Australia and Tasmania. Patterns in fire size and timing that will provide valuable information for the project’s sampling design are emerging.
Sampling has been undertaken in sites in mixed-species eucalypt forest in southern Victoria, the ACT and western and southern NSW. This sampling will determine the effect of prescribed fire on changes in fuel load, carbon pools and tree water use. The sampling scheme investigates ‘burn units’ – pairs of sites that have been measured and compared. The pair of sites can be burnt and unburnt areas near each other, sampled at the same time, or are a single site sampled at different times before and after prescribed burning. Nearly 50 burn units have been sampled across south eastern Australia. The data collected has been used to test if environmental variability is adequately captured for measurements made at different spatial scales and if fire size affects the optimal number of samples required for characterising burnt and unburnt areas.
The predictive model developed by this project will quantify the optimisation of environmental service outcomes for water and carbon management against the effectiveness of the fuel reductions outputs. This will assist fire and land management agencies by giving them greater confidence in forecasting results for their actions.
Ultimately, this project will move research and management capabilities to its next logical focus – building a predictive model and framework for planning of prescribed burns.
This will help predict the effects of fuel reduction burning on fuel loads, broad vegetation types and carbon and water potential (for example, capacity for carbon sequestration, water yield) of forests at a manageable spatial scale.
|21 Mar 2014||Optimisation of fuel reduction burning regimes for fuel reduction, carbon, water and vegetation outcomes||606.43 KB (606.43 KB)||fuel reduction, greenhouse gases, prescribed burning|
|04 Dec 2014||Optimising fuel reduction burning||605.15 KB (605.15 KB)||fire, fuel reduction, prescribed burning|
|02 Feb 2016||Research for better land management||133.76 KB (133.76 KB)||fuel reduction, land management, prescribed burning|
|22 Feb 2016||Optimisation of fuel reduction burning regimes - project overview||0 bytes (0 bytes)||fuel reduction, planning, prescribed burning|
|07 Jul 2017||Building bushfire predictive services capability||9.97 MB (9.97 MB)||fire, fire weather, modelling|
Optimising fuel reduction burning at the landscape- or catchment-scale requires knowledge of the effects of fire size on key variables – Fuel load, Vegetation and Carbon and Water cycles.
Optimisation of prescribed burning requires a strong understanding of the underlying variability of fuel, vegetation and soil.
This project focuses on improving the capability of land managers to use prescribed fire to reduce fuel loads, while at the same time mitigating the risks of loss of water yield and carbon sequestration capacity.
Soil organic matter has strong effects on soil properties such as water holding capacity, soil structure and stability, nutrient availability and cation exchange capacity. Bushfire can change these properties depending on intensity and duration of heating. Pyrolysis coupled to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (pyr-GC-MS) is a novel technique that can been used for soil characterisation.
|Fire spread prediction across fuel types||Dr Khalid Moinuddin||Victoria University|
|Fire surveillance and hazard mapping||Prof Simon Jones||RMIT University|
|Mapping bushfire hazard and impacts||Dr Marta Yebra||Australian National University|
|Improving land dryness measures and forecasts||Dr Imtiaz Dharssi||Bureau of Meteorology|
|Tools supporting fire management in northern Australia||Adj Prof Jeremy Russell-Smith||Charles Darwin University|