End User representatives
The 2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission recommended an annual treatment target of 5% of public land in Victoria. Subsequently, concerns were formally raised (for example in the Bushfires Royal Commission Implementation Monitor 2013 Annual Report) that such an area-based target may not deliver the most effective levels of risk reduction. Victoria has now moved to a risk-based approach for prescribed burning.
Concurrently, some other states have adopted prescribed burning targets, but formal attempts to evaluate its effects on risk to people, property and environmental values across different jurisdictions are lacking. Such extrapolation of the 2009 Royal Commission recommendation presupposes that there is a ‘one-size fits all’ solution to the problem. While many agencies are moving toward planning systems supposedly based on risk assessment, knowledge of the best way to use prescribed fire to reduce risk to key values is generally lacking.
The project aims to deliver:
- A Prescribed Burning Atlas to guide implementation of tailor-made prescribed burning strategies to suit the biophysical, climatic and human context of all bioregions across southern Australia. The Atlas will define the quantitative trajectory of risk reduction (including resultant residual risk) for multiple values (such as property, water, carbon, vegetation structure) in response to differing prescribed burning strategies (including spatial configurations and rates of treatment), across different Australian environments based on their unique climatic, biophysical and human characteristics.
- Continental-scale, biophysically-based models of ignition and fuel accumulation for Australian ecosystems, for use in dynamic risk management planning and operational decision-making about prescribed burning at seasonal and inter-annual time scales, accessible via the Atlas.
- Detailed scenarios of future change in risk mitigation effectiveness of prescribed burning strategies in response to integrated scenarios of changes to climate, fuel (including elevated CO2 effects) and ignitions. These will also be accessible through the Atlas.
Case study areas have been selected for fire spread simulations across southern Australia, based on the need to explore climatic, population and land use variation across the region.
While the initial focus has been on fire history, fire severity and a variety of layers needed to run the Phoenix RapidFire model, the project is also examining a broader range of biophysical datasets, which will inform both the simulation studies and also the empirical analyses. Simulations will be conducted, with the initial focus on peri-urban areas near Canberra, Adelaide, Hobart and the Gold Coast.
The Prescribed Burning Atlas being produced will provide quantitative risk-response relationships for prediction of the most probable outcome of different treatment strategies across varied bioregions. The Atlas will have an interactive interface for end-users that allows them to explore not just these risk-response relationships, but also fuel accumulation and ignition probability models as well as projections of changes to risk under different climate, land use and management scenarios. The Atlas will also potentially provide access to relevant data sets, reports and publications.
The Atlas is likely to be used in a range of ways, from strategic and tactical decision-making to policy development, resource allocation and education.
A prototype Atlas will be piloted amongst end-users in 2019 prior to full release in 2020. The Atlas is designed to be a living and updateable resource beyond the timeline of this project with the capacity to integrate new data and design features.
|2016||Journal Article||Resolving future fire management conflicts using multi-criteria decision making. Conservation Biology 30, 196-205 (2016).|
|2016||Report||From hectares to tailor-made solutions for risk mitigation: systems to deliver effective prescribed burning across Australian ecosystems: Annual project report 2015-2016. (Bushfire and Natural Hazards CRC, 2016).|
|2015||Journal Article||Reducing the risk of house loss due to wildfires. Environmental Modelling and Software 67, 12-25 (2015).|
|2015||Journal Article||Biogeographical variation in the potential effectiveness of prescribed fire in south-eastern Australia. Journal of Biogeography 42, 2234-2245 (2015).|
|2015||Presentation||From hectares to tailor-made solutions for risk mitigation: systems to deliver effective prescribed burning across Australian ecosystems. (2015).|
|04 Dec 2014||From hectares to tailor-made solutions for prescribed burning||902.97 KB (902.97 KB)||mitigation, prescribed burning, risk management|
|11 Sep 2015||Hazard Reduction Burn Windows||875.51 KB (875.51 KB)||prescribed burning|
|02 Feb 2016||Research for better land management||133.76 KB (133.76 KB)||fuel reduction, land management, prescribed burning|
|24 Oct 2016||From hectares to tailor-made solutions for risk mitigation: systems to deliver effective prescribed burning across ecosystems||1.83 MB (1.83 MB)||fire, prescribed burning, risk management|
|07 Jul 2017||Building bushfire predictive services capability||9.97 MB (9.97 MB)||fire, fire weather, modelling|
Although many jurisdictions are committed to prescribed burning, we do not understand its effects on risks to people, property and environmental values across Australia.
This project will deliver a prescribed burning atlas to guide implementation of ‘tailor-made’ prescribed burning strategies to suit the biophysical, climatic and human context of all bioregions across southern Australia
Bushfire management involves making decisions about complex issues that involve people, communities, stakeholders and organisations with many different perceptions and objectives.
How does prescribed burning effectiveness in mitigating risk depend on the diverse and changing biophysical, climatic and human context of southern Australia?