@article {bnh-5376, title = {Modelling wind direction distributions using a diagnostic model in the context of probabilistic fire spread prediction}, journal = {Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering: Thermal and Mass Transport}, year = {2019}, month = {02/2019}, abstract = {

With emerging research into the dynamics of extreme fire behaviour, it is increasingly important for wind models used in operational fire prediction to accurately capture areas of complex flow across rugged terrain. Additionally, the emergence of ensemble and stochastic modelling frameworks has led to the discussion of uncertainty in fire prediction. To capture the uncertainty of modelled fire outputs, it is necessary to recast uncertain inputs in probabilistic terms.\ 

WindNinja is the diagnostic wind model currently applied within a number of operational fire prediction frameworks across the world. For computational efficiency, allowing for real-time or faster than real-time prediction, the physical equations governing wind flow across complex terrain are often simplified. The model has a number of well documented limitations, for instance, it is known to perform least well on leeward slopes. This study first aims to understand these limitations in a probabilistic context by comparing individual deterministic predictions to observed distributions of wind direction. Secondly, a novel application of the deterministic WindNinja model is presented and shown to enable prediction of wind direction distributions that capture some of the variability of complex wind flow.\ 

Recasting wind fields in terms of probability distributions enables better understanding of variability across the landscape, and provides the probabilistic information required to capture uncertainty through ensemble or stochastic fire modelling. The comparisons detailed in this study indicate the potential for WindNinja to predict multimodal wind direction distributions that represent complex wind behaviours, including recirculation regions on leeward slopes. However, the limitations of using deterministic models within probabilistic frameworks are also highlighted. To enhance fire prediction and better understand uncertainty, it is recommended that statistical approaches also be developed to complement existing physics-based deterministic wind models.

}, keywords = {complex terrain, deterministic, ensemble modelling, Probability distributions, uncertainty, von Mises, wind modelling, WindNinja}, doi = {10.3389/fmech.2019.00005}, url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmech.2019.00005/abstract}, author = {Rachael Quill and Jason J. Sharples and Natalie Wagenbrenner and Leesa Sidhu and Jason Forthofer} }