News from the CRC

Release date
24 May 2018
More information:
David Bruce
Communications Manager

CRC is focused and engaged: review panel

An independent review of the achievements, the governance and management of the CRC over its first four and a half years has been completed. Commissioned by the CRC Board, the review was carried out to ensure that the CRC understands what it is doing well and not so well, to ensure that steps can be taken to improve the way the CRC operates. The review was also asked to consider plans for the future of the CRC beyond the current funding period.

In general, the independent review panel confirmed that the CRC is progressing well with its research, utilisation and outreach activities and is on the right track to defining its longer-term future.

Led by Professor Mary O’Kane AC and including Euan Ferguson, AFSM and Dr Tracey Arklay, the review panel heard from staff, researchers, end-users and PhD students in May on current work and on the future directions of not just the research, but the centre itself.

The panel gave its opinions on progress and the direction of the research program, and provided advice and options on moving forward. It found that the research is of very good quality and that end-users find the CRC work important in building their appreciation of the value of research, particularly strategically focused research.

The review panel made recommendations on options for transitioning from a CRC to a research centre after the CRC funding ends in 2021.

This guidance was timely and helpful, explained CRC CEO Dr Richard Thornton. “This review was an opportunity to gain key insights from independent experts on how we are tracking and where we need to head,” Dr Thornton said.

“We have collectively achieved a great deal over the last four years, and there are many good examples of how our research is making a difference to the way our partners carry out their business. But there is still more to do, and the findings of the review will help us continue to build an ongoing research capability for the sector.”

The review took place on 9-11 May. While a fourth-year review is no longer an official requirement of the Commonwealth CRC program, the CRC Board felt that an independent review would still be useful as an opportunity for external reviewers to comment on governance and management arrangements, research and outputs, utilisation activities and to provide suggestions for the current operations and on opportunities for its future structure.

The CRC will now use the findings of the review to inform its practices in research and science innovation. The recommendations will be discussed by the Board at its next meeting in August in Perth.

Read the review report here.

More news from the CRC

Unpacking complexity workshop, Wellington 2018
The connections between Australian and New Zealand research in natural hazards were the focus of a workshop in Wellington last month.
Learning from past experiences is integral to emergency management. Photo: South Australia SES (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

Two CRC end-users have spoken about their first-hand experiences being involved in a research project that is shaping the way emergency managers think, learn and communicate information to their teams in highly...

Prof Vivienne Tippett OAM
CRC researcher Professor Vivienne Tippett has been recognised for her efforts and contributions to science with a Queen’s Birthday Medal of the Order of Australia.
Dr Mel Taylor, EMPA research award 2018
CRC research on how to best plan for animals in an emergency has taken out the inaugural Emergency Media and Public Affairs (EMPA) research award, while another project on emergency warnings has been highly commended.
Peter Middleton's research is improving communication in Tasmania's emergency services.
CRC associate student researcher Peter Middleton says his recent experience at the latest Research Advisory Forum in Sydney has enhanced the way he presents his research.
During emergencies, individuals and teams often work under considerable pressure. Photo: New Zealand Fire Service.
There is a lot happening at an incident management centre when a bushfire, flood or cyclone occurs but two checklists are helping emergency management teams carry out effective teamwork.
Science is helping our emergency services keep us safe.
Conducting research is one thing, but applied research that partners scientists and emergency management experts together, resulting in real world outcomes, is another altogether.
An interviewee shows a researcher the impact the bushfire had on his property. Photo: NSW Rural Fire Service.
In January and February 2017, New South Wales faced some of the worst bushfire conditions ever forecast for the state, including Catastrophic fire danger ratings for many communities. During this time, a number of large...
Coaching and mentoring are relationship-based activities that require cooperation. Photo: Department of Biodiversity, Conversations and Attractions WA.
A vital new resource, backed by research, explores how coaching and mentoring builds incident management team capability for the emergency management sector.
Drivers for the coaching and mentoring resource include unique demands on IMT roles. Photo: Victoria State Emergency Service
Issue Two of Fire Australia for 2018 includes stories on two tools that are resolving breakdowns in teamwork, the findings from three catastrophic bushfires in NSW and a showcase of the latest CRC research that is...

News archives

AFAC17 logo

AFAC17 logo

All the resources from our 2017 conference

National research priorities for natural hazards

National research priorities for natural hazards

National priorities for research

The Sir Ivan fire. Photo: Nick Moir, Fairfax Media

The Sir Ivan fire. Photo: Nick Moir, Fairfax Media

Research findings from 2017 NSW fires

Four years of highlights

Bushfire planning with kids ebook

Explore by keyword