News from the CRC

debris-flow-near-licola-victoria.jpg

A very large debris flow near Licola (East Gippsland, Victoria) after 2007 bushfires.
A very large debris flow near Licola (East Gippsland, Victoria) after 2007 bushfires.
Release date
08 May 2017

Science-backed tools enhance water catchment management

Heavy rain in areas burnt by bushfire can mobilise massive volumes of sediments and nutrients into rivers and water reservoirs, threatening the quality and supply of water to Australia’s capital and regional cities and damaging freshwater ecosystems.

The latest AFAC case study explores how researchers with the former Bushfire CRC are now working with ACT Parks and Conservation Service (ACT PCS) and AFAC's Rural and Land Management (RLM) Group. The partnership has developed an innovative suite of tools and resources to help end-users identify water catchments susceptible to post-fire soil erosion, flooding and water quality risks.

ACT PCS managed and trialled the suite of tools successfully in 2015/16 and now uses the resources to plan prescribed burning operations and also target drainage and infrastructure works in identified risk- prone areas with significant water assets and important ecosystems.

Dr Petter Nyman and colleague Dr Gary Sheridan of the University of Melbourne drew on their research with the Bushfire CRC’s Fire in the landscape project and their former work with the Victorian Bushfire Rapid Risk Assessment Team (Bushfire RRAT) to develop the evidence-based tool kit. They investigated the link between factors such as fire severity, rainfall intensity and post-fire debris flow processes. This included site-specific studies in north eastern Victoria.

“Burned headwaters catchments contain large amounts of ash, sediment and debris that can be flushed into rivers and water supply reservoirs. High sediment loads from debris flows cause high turbidity and water contamination due to increased nutrient and metals from pollutants in the runoff,” according to Dr Nyman.

This type of contamination occurred from post-fire debris flows after the Canberra fires in 2003, resulting in water restrictions to the ACT until a new water treatment plant was constructed.

“We also saw this type of contamination in the Ovens River after the Eastern Victorian alpine bushfires in 2003 due to sediment and nutrient from debris flows in burned headwaters,” says Dr Nyman.

“Debris flows also led to contamination of Lake Glenmaggie after the 2007 bushfires in Victoria. The impacts of burned catchment on water quality were also documented elsewhere in south east Australia, including the Nattai Catchments near Sydney and the Lofty Ranges near Adelaide, although we have not yet observed the extreme type of debris flow processes in these areas.

“These scenarios from various landscapes across south eastern Australia highlight the importance of considering water quality issues when managing fire in high value water-supply catchments,” he says.

The researchers worked directly with ACT PCS, as the lead end-user agency and in collaboration with AFAC’s Research Utilisation Manager, Dr Noreen Krusel, and the RLM group to develop and implement utilisation of their CRC research.

Their collaboration delivered two key outputs for utilisation. The initial output funded by AFAC in 2014, was an Australia-wide assessment of post-fire erosion risk accompanied by generic guidelines for evaluating risk to water quality. This was followed by the development of a suite of GIS tools, funded, managed and successfully trialed by ACT PCS in 2016. The tools generate post-fire risk assessments of erosion, flooding and water quality and build on other collaborative work by the researchers for the Bushfire RRATs in Victoria.

ACT PCS lead end-user Dr Adam Leavesley says the work has changed the way the agency identifies and manages the potential impact of post-fire erosion.

“The tools have enabled us to integrate water quality risk into our burn planning and implementation, plus they have given us the capacity to assess the risk after planned and unplanned fires,” he said.

The AFAC case study, available on the AFAC Research Utilisation page, examines the key factors that enabled this complex research to be utilised effectively.

The researchers and end-users agree that the key success factor was their partnership approach, which was built on mutual trust and commitment to deliver practical, science-backed resources.

For further information on the research contact:
Dr Petter Nyman: nymanp@unimelb.edu.au
Dr Noreen Krusel: Noreen.krusel@afac.com.au.

For further information on the ACT trial, contact Dr Adam Leavesley: adam.leavesley@act.gov.au.

More news from the CRC

New journal articles and reports on CRC research are available online.
A flood wipes out a bridge in southern WA, February 2017. Photo: Dana Fairhead
Changing the focus of warning messages based on research has been the key to ensure critical safety advice is heard and acted upon.
Photo: Sascha Grant CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
Using the latest satellite-based earth observation systems and the Himawari satellite, research will allow fire managers to hone in on bushfires before they become too large to handle.
Photo: Michael Dawes (CC BY-NC 2.0)
Research has shown that improvements can be made that can strengthen houses to reduce wind damage, as well as save money through the reduction of insurance premiums.
Photo: South Australia SES
‘What if?’ scenario modelling by the CRC is helping government, planning authorities and emergency service agencies think through the costs and consequences of various options on preparing for major disasters and how...
Photo: South Australia SES
Emergency Management Victoria is embedding national findings to develop a better understanding of resilience at the state level, using baseline data to build a ‘living’ resilience index within the organisation.
Photo: New Zealand Fire Service

Teamwork is essential to ensure incident management teams function to the best of their ability in challenging and high stakes environments. To help improve teamwork, practical tools have been developed by the...

Prescribed burning underway. Photo Veronique Florec
Not everything that is important can be assigned a dollar value, with research helping natural hazards managers justify the use and allocation of resources for mitigation efforts.
Photo: Rex Boggs (CC By-ND 2.0)
CRC research is informing community flood warning campaigns, emergency services training and national policy initiatives.
Photo: Nathan Maddock, Bushfire and Natural Hazards CRC
Sophisticated fire mapping and modelling of fire severity is helping fire and land managers assess greenhouse gas emissions and develop carbon abatement plans.

News archives

AFAC17 logo

AFAC17 logo

All the resources from our 2017 conference

National research priorities for natural hazards

National research priorities for natural hazards

National priorities for research

November update: Southern Australian Seasonal Bushfire Outlook 2017-18

Bushfire outlook 2017-18

Four years of highlights

Bushfire planning with kids ebook

Explore by keyword